Obama’s intelligence policy

While Barack Obama’s progressive supporters are busy celebrating, government insiders are cautioning against any premature ideas that the new President-elect is likely to implement any meaningful change in policy. Intelligence is no exception. A recent report in the Wall Street Journal states that “Obama is unlikely to radically overhaul controversial Bush administration intelligence policies”. 

Moreover, Obama’s intelligence transition team is said to be composed largely of what observers call “pragmatists”, i.e. mostly officials “who have supported Republicans, and centrist former officials in the Clinton administration”. These “centrist pragmatists” include John Brennan, former head of the National Counterterrorism Center and supporter of so-called “enhanced interrogation techniques”. Another member of the team is no other than Jami Miscik, “the fastest-rising woman in the history of the CIA”, who later left the Agency to join Lehman Brothers. Prior to leaving the CIA, Miscik became known for defending the CIA’s politicized (and suspiciously inaccurate) report titled “Iraq and al-Qaida: Assessing a Murky Relationship”, which helped the Bush Administration put forward the fictitious connection between Saddam Hussein and the al-Qaeda.

 

Notably, Brennan once publicly defended the practice of extraordinary rendition (i.e. the transfer of prisoners held by the CIA to countries that routinely practice torture during interrogation) as an “absolutely vital tool” with which he had “been intimately familiar […] over the past decade”. He is now said to be “a potential candidate for a top intelligence post” under Barack Obama.

 

Administration appointments aside, it is interesting to see what passes for “centrist pragmatism” in today’s US intelligence environment. If career officials who support extraordinary rendition and the extralegal use of torture are described as moderate “centrist pragmatists”, then what are hardliners like? [IA]

.

About these ads

About intelNews
Expert news and commentary on intelligence, espionage, spies and spying, by Dr. Joseph Fitsanakis and Ian Allen.

2 Responses to Obama’s intelligence policy

  1. There is a Real Charm about the Moderates in Both The Republicans, as well as The Democrats Conservative Powers that Islam is embracing. Thats The Strength these Muslims are Getting from Our Government to Destroy these Extremists and Drug Thugs with their Own Mentality. No One Man, yet at the same Time, The President and Former Presidents are Setting Secretly into Place all The Chips on a Sure Bet that The Muslim World will be in Good Shape, to be Found, by Participating in the Destruction of These Terrorists by the Hands of The Worlds Democracies and Republics as well as All The Kingdoms that are Secretly making this Happen, President Obama is The Chieftain and The Supreme Ambassador to The Muslim World and All The Kings Men, will Not Put The Anti-Christs of This Terrorist Machine together again. The Jubalation of This Victory is Foretold In The Living Word of God and He will Claim that which is His. His People, of Every walk,Tounge, Kindred and Nation, Kingdom and Faith of His People, on the Face of His Earth. God is Real, and He is Awesome.Our Independence is Great, For Gods Glory! Amen. Volunteer intelligence

  2. Pingback: Vitamin D key to Swine Flu? More interesting sites | General Blogger Here

IntelNews welcomes corrections. Send us yours by filling in the form below.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 751 other followers