Will former US government informant face terror charges in India?

David HeadleyBy IAN ALLEN | intelNews.org |
A former United States government informant, who helped an Islamist militant group plan the 2008 Mumbai attacks in India, has been sentenced to 35 years in prison. David Coleman Headley, a former US Drug Enforcement Administration informant, was arrested by the Federal Bureau of Investigation in 2009 for helping to plot an attack by Islamist radicals on a Danish newspaper. It eventually became apparent that Headley had been a member of Pakistani militant group Lashkar e-Taiba and had also helped plan the 2008 attacks in the Indian city of Mumbai. The terrorist plot involved at least a dozen attacks on tourist and other civilian targets in India’s largest city, conducted by small cells of highly trained LeT members who had arrived from Pakistan by boat. The coordinated attacks, which began on November 26 and ended three days later, killed 164 and wounded over 300 people. According to the FBI, Headley, who was born to a Pakistani father and an American mother, took advantage of his Western manners and physique to travel to Mumbai posing as an American tourist, in order to help map out the LeT operation. On Thursday, a court in Chicago sentenced Headley to 35 years in prison. Prior to his sentencing, Headley had pleaded guilty to all 12 counts brought against him by US prosecutors and is said to be cooperating with authorities —which is reportedly why he was spared the death penalty. However, the question in the minds of many terrorism observers is, will Headley be extradited to India to face charges there for what is often referred to as ‘India’s 9/11’? The answer is not so simple. IntelNews readers may recall that, in 2009, US officials denied Indian investigators access to Headley. Intelligence commentators were surprised by the US move at the time in light the close security ties between Washington and New Delhi. It now appears that part of Headley’s deal with US government prosecutors is that he will cooperate in return for not being extradited to India. Although the US has said it intends to honor the agreement, the Indian government has vowed to continue to press for Headleys’ extradition. Legal scholars claim that Headley could be extradited to India only if he were to violate the terms of his plea agreement with US authorities. At that point, the Pakistani-American would be subject to existing extradition treaties between the US and India. Until then, however, he is to remain firmly on US soil. Meanwhile, the consistent refusal of US officials to allow Indian interrogators access to Headley has sparked countless rumors in India —admittedly a country that is especially fond of conspiracy theories. One such theory is that Headley may be a former agent of the Central Intelligence Agency and that the Americans are shielding their secrets by rejecting Indian requests to meet with him.

6 Responses to Will former US government informant face terror charges in India?

  1. I’m surprised at no mention of the USA arguing for ISI immunity in the 2008 Mumbai attacks in your previous article:


    It seems at least a bit germane, were the CIA/NSA opposed to evidence entered into the court record of the ISI involvement (supposing material support at minimum), the question arises; what might Headley know that could complicate the already complicated relationship with Pakistani intelligence, were the USA to hand him over to India? Just a thought

  2. AlbertE. says:

    Are we speaking of Daood Gilani? That David name an alias for the terror reconnaissance. Daood and his buddy Rana had the halal ranch and slaughtehouse right smack dam in the middle of the most nuclear place in the U.S., Kinsman IL. ONLY a twenty minute drive in any direction and you have four active nuclear plants and a nuclear storage area. That place now back in business. I hope the FBI searched that facility good for hidden weapons and explosives. Take it from there.

  3. intelNews says:

    @Ronald Thomas West: Good call. Though at least I’m proud to say we did cover that largely overlooked story last month. [JF]

  4. mopsie says:

    India has armed drones and I wish they would use them to attempt to get this guy. Anyone killed is labeled as a militant, and anyone who assists them gets dbl tapped. The USA has established all the necessary legal/moral justification for a strike against a known terrorist.

  5. Pete says:

    I suspect Headley knows too much about the joint US-Pakistan Abbottabad house arrest operation (2005-2011) to risk his discussing it in an Indian court. See http://gentleseas.blogspot.com.au/2012/10/from-2005-us-intel-white-house-kneww.html

  6. davide says:

    He looks like it is the son of David Bowie having different colored eyes

We welcome informed comments and corrections. Comments attacking or deriding the author(s), instead of addressing the content of articles, will NOT be approved for publication.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: