Ex-KGB spy Litvinenko was working for MI6 when he died

Alexander LitvinenkoBy JOSEPH FITSANAKIS | intelNews.org |
Confidential documents leaked to the British press show that a leading medical examiner wants to reinspect the 2006 death of a former Soviet intelligence officer, in light of new revelations. Alexander Litvinenko was an employee of the Soviet KGB and its successor organization, the FSB, who in 2000 defected with his family to the United Kingdom. He soon became known as an increasingly vocal critic of the administration of Russian President Vladimir Putin. In 2006, Litvinenko came down with radioactive poisoning soon after meeting a former colleague, Andrey Lugovoy, in a London restaurant. The latter is believed by British authorities to have assassinated Litvinenko “with the backing of the Russian state”. Although much of the case remains shrouded in mystery, an important new clue was added to the equation in October, when Litvinenko’s widow publicly admitted that her husband had been a paid employee of British intelligence services MI5 and MI6. Marina Litvinenko told British tabloid newspaper The Mail on Sunday that Alexander had advised both agencies on “combat[ing] Russian organized crime in Europe”. She had previously denied rumors that her husband had been working for British intelligence when he was killed —ostensibly by the Russian government. The revelation appears to have prompted a British coroner to request that the medical investigation into Litvinenko’s death be reopened. Documents leaked to The Mail on Sunday appear to show that Andrew Reid, a coroner at St Pankras Hospital in London, has formally requested that both MI5 and MI6 release all of their internal files on Litvinenko, in the context of a new investigation. Dr Reid, who is in charge of an ongoing classified inquest into the former KGB officer’s alleged assassination, states in his written request that any evidence supplied by MI5 and MI6 will be fed into “a wide-ranging investigation” that will “extend beyond the mechanical circumstances of [Litvinenko’s] death”. The medical examiner adds that the information regarding Litvinenko’s employment with the British intelligence services requires further elaboration, and that the inquest into the late spy’s death may benefit from any documents, reports, and telephone or email intercepts, that British intelligence may have on him. Dr Reid’s request also raises the possibility that the inquest may be upgraded into a full-scale public inquiry headed by a senior judge, who will be able to consider evidence by MI5 and MI6, presented behind closed doors at an “appropriately secure” venue.

About these ads

One Response to Ex-KGB spy Litvinenko was working for MI6 when he died

  1. Actually Litvenyenko had already poisoned by the time he met with Dimitry Kovtun and Andrei Lugovoi in the hotel lobby.
    They made plans to meet again the next day, but Litvenyenko called the next morning to say he was sick but never recovered.
    Litvenyenko had just came from lunch with the shifty Italian Mario Scaramella who evidently is a proxy for Boris Berezovsky. Any research on him, even Wiki reveals he’s a fraud.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1535126/Im-not-Vladimir-says-the-third-man.html

    The cables are very enlightening. The pattern they reveal is that Putin was being sent a message either over the Yukos affair or by the silvoki to keep him from relinquishing power.
    My feeling is that this was a diversion for Tony Blair’s screw ups or as a favor to his oligarchy benefactors. After Brown got into power, the histrionics were dropped.

    “2. (S) In a December 7 dinner meeting with Amb. Henry Crumpton, Russian Special Presidential. Representative. Anatoliy Safonov welcomed several proposals aimed at extending bilateral counterterrorism (CT) cooperation. Safonov opened the meeting by expressing his appreciation for U.S./Russian cooperative efforts thus far. He cited the recent events in London – specifically the murder of a former Russian spy by exposure to radioactive agents – as evidence of how great the threat remained and how much more there was to do on the cooperative front. (Comment: The implication was that the FOR was not involved, although Safonov did not offer any further explanation.) Safonov noted the daunting number of countries that posed particular terrorism threats, mentioning North Korea, Pakistan, South Africa, Libya, Iran, India, and Israel (sic?).”

    “Safonov claimed that Russian authorities in London had known about and followed individuals moving radioactive substances into the city but were told by the British that they were under control before the poisoning took place.”

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/90864?INTCMP=ILCNETTXT3487

    IN PUTIN’S VIEW, THERE WERE “FORCES” THAT DID NOT WANT
    TO SEE IMPROVEMENT IN RUSSIA’S RELATIONS WITH EUROPE. BOTH
    MURDERS [POLITKOVSKAYA AND LITVINENKO ] HAD BEEN TRAGIC, BUT THEY NEEDED TO BE INVESTIGATED
    AND THOSE RESPONSIBLE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE.
    06MOSCOW13073

    It’s not until the real politik specialist Frank Burns gets involved is the death used opportunistically as leverage whenever possible against Russia.
    Whenever Frank Burns shows up, trouble starts. Sectarian civil war in Iraq, and now in Syria the same pattern is emerging.

    http://www.cablegatesearch.net/search.php?q=Litvinenko&qo=0&qc=0&qto=2010-02-28

IntelNews welcomes corrections. Send us yours by filling in the form below.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 713 other followers