Notes on the assassination of Iranian IRGC Commander Hassan Mahdawi

IRGC - ABTHE TARGETED KILLING OF Hassan Mahdawi, a high-ranking member of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) and the commander of the Quds Force in Syria and Lebanon, was carried out by Israel on April 1, 2024. The actual assassination was based on precise operational intelligence, while Israel’s assessment of Iran’s response was wrong.

On the day of the attack, a building adjacent to the Iranian Embassy in the Syrian capital of Damascus was attacked with rockets. The attack killed seven IRGC members: General Muhammad Reza Zahedi, also known as Hassan Mahdawi, his deputy, and five additional officers. Mahdawi is the most senior Iranian commander to be killed since the assassination of IRGC Quds Force Commander Qasem Soleimani by the United States in 2020.

Mahdawi had close ties with Hezbollah. He maintained a close relationship with Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah and was perceived by Israel to be directly coordinating the military attacks on Israel from Lebanon and Syria. In Tehran’s collective memory, Israel’s history of attacks against it includes numerous strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, assassinations of scientists within Iran, and actions against Iranian proxies in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen. Traditionally, these attacks have been invariably met with attacks by Iran’s proxies in the region.

This time, it was different. Iran recognized Mahdawi’s assassination as a direct attack on Iran that it could not tolerate, and had to respond to differently. Just days following Mahdawi’s assassination, Iran attacked Israel. According to the Israel Defense Forces, 99 percent of the more than 330 weapons fired at Israel (including at least 185 drones and 110 surface-to-surface missiles) were intercepted, mostly over the territory of countries adjacent to Israel. Iran’s attack on Israel was unprecedented. It was launched directly from Iranian territory in contrast to prior cases, when Iran has used its proxies, supposedly leaving its hands clean.

Israel could not tolerate such a blatant infringement on its sovereignty. After Israeli officials vowed a response to the Iranian attack, the Jewish State counter-attacked, causing minor damage to the Eighth Shekari Air Base in northwest Esfahan, a dozen kilometers from the Natanz nuclear facility. It was a calculated response designed to deliver a message to Iran that Israel could and would respond to an attack. Following Israel’s counterattack, the tensions between Iran and Israel have subsided for the time being.

While the attack on General Mahdawi was based on excellent operational intelligence, it became evident that the Israeli assessment regarding a possible Iranian response was erroneous. The Israeli assessment was that the Iranian response would be similar to what occurred in the past —namely limited attacks by Hezbollah on northern Israel and attacks on the Golan heights by Iranian proxies in Syria. Israel simply did not anticipate a direct Iranian attack on Israel from Iranian territory.

It seems that Israeli senior analysts were entangled in a conception of Iran’s past behavior and anticipated that Tehran’s response would be similar to prior cases, namely utilizing Iran’s proxies. Israel did not pay enough attention to the difference between Mahdawi’s assassination and previous attacks against Iran. This time, the attack targeted the Iranian embassy in Damascus and the target was a very senior official, who was close to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

It appears that Israel’s assessment of the Iranian response to Mahdawi’s assassination was a strategic failure. It appears more likely that the Israeli War Cabinet was provided with an incorrect assessment by the nation’s intelligence community, and less likely that it was provided with an incorrect assessment, which it then decided to ignore. There is concern in Israel that the intelligence assessment was once again wrong, after the colossal failure to anticipate the October 7 attack on Israel by Hamas.

Author: Avner Barnea | Date: 26 April 2024 | Permalink

Dr. Avner Barnea is research fellow at the National Security Studies Center of the University of Haifa in Israel. He served as a senior officer in the Israel Security Agency (ISA). He is the author of We Never Expected That: A Comparative Study of Failures in National and Business Intelligence (Lexington Books, 2021).

About intelNews
Expert news and commentary on intelligence, espionage, spies and spying, by Dr. Joseph Fitsanakis and Ian Allen.

2 Responses to Notes on the assassination of Iranian IRGC Commander Hassan Mahdawi

  1. Israel’s longer term (about 10 days) intelligence assessment of the likely Iranian response to Israel’s assassination of General Hassan Mahdawi was indeed wrong.

    But, I’d say, Israeli military intelligence in the shorter term (about 3 days) redeemed itself by acted quickly on warnings received from Arab countries sitting between Iran and Israel and from the US that drones and missiles from Iran would be on their way to Israel.

    This short term redemption was possible because Iran apparently gave those Arab countries (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Jorden, and Iraq) a few days notice that Iran would be sending those drones and missiles through their airspace on the way to Israel. Unsurprisingly some or all of those Arab countries forwarded the warnings to Israel and the US. Also Israel and the US, no doubt by intelligence means, intercepted Iran’s warnings to those Arab countries.

    I think Iran may have even telegraphed its intentions far and wide for all to hear in order to signal its displeasure, but not to cause too much death and destruction in Israel.

    So, yes Israel’s longer term assessments were off, but Israeli and US intelligence acted quickly enough in the shorter term for a multinational shootdown of 99% of Iran’s drones and missiles causing minimal destruction in Israel.

  2. Jimmy Gilbert says:

    Israel’s intelligence assessment, may or may not be, is purely a waste of time attempting to Arm-Chair-Quarterback… Israel has been a fine history teacher over her time on the planet. Israel had a need, and she didn’t hesitate to remove that need. Regardless of Iran’s response, Israel proved to the world she isn’t alone, and can protect herself if need be. Iran on the other hand proved a different story, and so did the Russian S300… It all boils down to one side launching over 300 projectiles, to make a hole, that was filled in an hour. The other, fired 3 projectiles, taking out their most advance defense system… Where I sit, another fine history lesson… Lesson learn: If You help those who attack and kill babies and take civilian hostages, their will be consequences, Sparkie… Israel doesn’t need to hide behind a proxy, period.

We welcome informed comments and corrections. Comments attacking or deriding the author(s), instead of addressing the content of articles, will NOT be approved for publication.