S. Korea’s spy agency accused of politicization, ‘dividing country’

Won Sei-hoonBy JOSEPH FITSANAKIS | intelNews.org |
South Korea’s main opposition party has accused the country’s intelligence agency of acting as a “political provocateur”, “championing conservative causes” and promoting partisanship among the electorate. Lawmakers from the liberal Democratic Party (DP) of South Korea were reacting to allegations last week that the country’s National Intelligence Service (NIS) deliberately leaked a classified document in order to embarrass former South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun. IntelNews readers will recall that, earlier this year, Won Sei-hoon, who headed NIS from 2008 to 2013, was indicted for meddling in the 2012 Presidential Election. According to the indictment, Won ordered a group of NIS officers to “flood the Internet” with messages accusing DP candidates of being “North Korean sympathizers”. Prosecutors allege that Won initiated the Internet-based psychological operation because he was convinced that “leftist adherents of North Korea” were on their way to “regaining power” in the South. If Won, who has since resigned from his NIS post, is found guilty, he faces sentencing of up to five years in prison. Won’s indictment has increased tensions between the DP and the conservative Saenuri Party, which is currently in power in Seoul, and is believed to have strong ties with NIS executive circles. The NIS is supposed to be politically nonpartisan, though its history is highly controversial. Democratization within the NIS only began in the late 1980s, as South Korean politics gradually emerged from a Cold War period dominated by bloody rightwing military coups. This past June, as the country continued to deliberate the 2012 Internet postings affair, the NIS “mistakenly” declassified an internal document describing a series of secret North-South Korean negotiations. The document, from 2007, shows that the then-President of Korea, Roh Moo-hyun, from the liberal-centrist Uri Party (now DP), had proposed to North Korean officials the establishment of a “maritime peace zone” along the disputed border between the two nations. Liberal politicians allege that, according to South Korean declassification laws, the document should have remained secret for many decades, and accuse the NIS of deliberately leaking it in order to promote the image of South Korean liberals as “North Korean sympathizers”. Many have called for Won’s successor, Nam Jae-joon, to resign; but the NIS Director denies responsibility for the leak. The Washington Post reports that “small groups of protesters” have begun gathering in recent days in cities across the country to push for an investigation into NIS’ political activities and to urge South Korea’s conservative President, Park Geun-hye, to take a stance on the issue. Park has so far remained mostly silent on the subject, saying she did not benefit from NIS’s Internet campaign during the 2012 election.

3 Responses to S. Korea’s spy agency accused of politicization, ‘dividing country’

  1. Pete says:

    Few countries host heads of intelligence and security agencies that have a high public-political profile. South Korean agency heads seem a fairly negative influence. Harder to assess the generally high public profile of current and former heads of the CIA and Mossad.

    Don’t know whether Petraeus would have been outed by the FBI then effectively sacked “resigned” as DCI if he had been an Obama man.

  2. TFH says:

    The Vikings noticed and noted in their religious texts that none is a worse enemy than a relative, “frændur eru frændum verstir” literally “uncles are worst to uncles.” Case in point.

  3. wjsfree says:

    Overseas Koreans protests against #NISgate in USA http://storify.com/wjsfree/overseas-koreans-protests-against-nisgate-in-usa Television stations (KBS, SBS, MBC, YTN) and main stream newspaper in South korea don’t cover these protests against NISgate. Plz help!

We welcome informed comments and corrections. Comments attacking or deriding the author(s), instead of addressing the content of articles, will NOT be approved for publication.