US intelligence agencies urge ‘cautious approach’ on Ukraine
March 4, 2014 Leave a comment
By IAN ALLEN | intelNews.org
American intelligence agencies see Russia’s control of the Crimean Peninsula as near-complete and urge Washington to take cautious steps on Ukraine, as Moscow appears prepared “to take military action” in defense of its strategic goals. The Los Angeles Times reported on Monday that some American intelligence analysts believe Moscow is genuinely convinced that its military action in Ukraine is justified under the Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances. The agreement was signed in 1994 by the United States, United Kingdom, and the Russian Federation. The three nuclear powers guaranteed that they would refrain from actions that would subvert the territorial integrity and political autonomy of Ukraine. Western officials have accused Moscow of violating the agreement by dispatching Russian troops to southeastern Ukraine without the consent of the Ukrainian government. But some American intelligence analysts believe the Russian Foreign Ministry is convinced that Russian forces are acting within the scope of the 1994 agreement. The latter is interpreted by Russian officials as permitting Moscow to unilaterally dispatch up to 25,000 troops to the Crimea. This may even be the predominant view at the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), judging by a briefing given last week by the Director of the CIA, John Brennan, to an unnamed “senior lawmaker”. The Times cited “US officials who declined to be named” as saying that Brennan suggested that Russian officials genuinely believe that the number of Russian troops in Ukraine “remains well below the threshold” specified in the Budapest Memorandum. Brennan added that, although he did not personally agree with Moscow’s interpretation of the Memorandum, it would be wise for Washington to tread cautiously on the subject, given the fact that Russian policy on Crimea remains unpredictable. The paper quoted “a US official who asked not to be named”, who said that intelligence agencies did not predict Russia’s military incursion into Ukraine —something which is disputed by the CIA. Some intelligence analysts now believe that Russian President Vladimir Putin may have made a “spur of the moment decision” to dispatch troops to Ukraine following the toppling of the pro-Russian government in Kiev. The paper spoke to Shawn Turner, spokesman for the Office of the US Director of National Intelligence, who dismissed any suggestions that there might have been shortcomings in the intelligence assessment of Moscow’s intentions about Ukraine as “uninformed and misleading”.