June 26, 2023
by Joseph Fitsanakis
IN THE EARLY HOURS of June 23, PMC Wagner leader Yevgeny Prigozhin declared the launch of an armed campaign against the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation. Within hours, several thousand soldiers belonging to Wagner, one of the world’s largest private military companies, had abandoned their positions in eastern Ukraine and were en route to Moscow. Their mission, according to Prigozhin, was to arrest Minister of Defense Sergei Shoigu and Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov, and try them for mismanagement and corruption.
In the ensuing hours, National Guard units along the M-4, a 1,100-mile-long expressway that connects the northeastern shores of the Black Sea to Moscow, began blocking or destroying critical junctures across that vast road network, in an attempt to obstruct the Wagner convoy. In a televised nationwide address, a visibly shaken Vladimir Putin accused Prigozhin of leading an armed insurrection, and warned those who followed him that they would be treated as traitors. Meanwhile, tickets on flights from Moscow to several visa-free international destinations were sold out within hours, as Muscovites braced for the outbreak of civil war.
Yet, within fewer than 24 hours, Prigozhin, who had repeatedly vowed to reach Moscow or die trying, was on his way to Belarus. He had seemingly accepted a deal to abandon his loyal troops in exchange for amnesty and a life in exile. Prigozhin’s sudden about-face surprised many observers, who had expected to see firefights between Spetsnaz units and Wagner forces in Moscow’s southern districts by Sunday afternoon. Even some of Prigozhin’s own troops took to social media to openly accuse their former leader of betrayal, and vow revenge.
PRIGOZHIN: A RATIONAL AND CALCULATED ACTOR
How are we to explain this unexpected turn of events? The difficulty of such a task is amplified by the lack of reliable reporting from Russia, along with the inherent chaos of war and the rapidly changing nature of events. It must be stressed, however, that Prigozhin is neither impulsive nor irrational. His maneuvers over the past week were calculated and almost certainly pre-planned and choreographed —most likely long in advance. His ultimate decision to seek political asylum in Belarus —one of the few countries in the world that is unlikely to turn him over to the United States— makes sense under one premise: that the motive behind his “justice march” to Moscow was not to challenge Putin, but to save his life.
To begin with, the bitter feud between Prigozhin and the Russian Ministry of Defense is not new. It has been raging for years. It both precedes and exceeds Russia’s ongoing military campaign in Ukraine. The
Wagner leader has repeatedly expressed his dismay at being viewed as an outsider by the Ministry of Defense, which it views as an elitist and incompetent bureaucracy. His experience in Ukraine, where Wagner’s forces faced stiff resistance from the local population and the Ukrainian military alike, added fuel to his rage against a host of Russian defense officials. Prigozhin has been voicing his denunciations of the way these officials have managed the war since March of 2022, just two weeks into the invasion of Ukraine.
PRIGOZHIN’S DISILLUSIONMENT
The disastrous Russian military campaign in Ukraine only served to sharpen Prigozhin’s criticism of his country’s defense establishment. One can observe this in the evolution of his critiques over time. In recent months, the Wagner leader has not only criticized the Ministry of Defense, accusing his leadership of corruption, but he has increasingly directed his ire against broad segments of Russian society. In his video tirades, he often decries what he describes as “the Russian elite” and the “oligarchy”, whom it accuses of living in luxury, while Russia’s working class fights and dies in Ukraine, Syria, Libya, and elsewhere. Read more of this post
Rare exposé examines secretive world of pro-Ukraine Russian intelligence operatives
November 7, 2026 by intelNews 1 Comment
The BBC premiered the documentary, “Shadowmen: Russians Working With Ukraine” on 19 October. It was produced by veteran Polish journalist Marcin Mamon, who participated during the Cold War in opposition activities against Poland’s pro-Soviet communist government. Mamon claimed that the BBC independently confirmed both Russian men operated on behalf of the GUR, but added it was impossible to “know the full picture”.
Mamon also noted that both the GUR and the two Russian operatives were cautious about sharing details of their activities inside Russia, which made their claims impossible to verify. As a matter of policy, Ukraine never officially claims responsibility for targeted attacks. However, Ukrainian officials have spoken in the past about Ukraine’s strategy of carrying out coordinated drone strikes inside Russia and have acknowledged Kyiv’s use of clandestine agents on Russian soil.
‘IVAN’ AND ‘FOMA’
Those interviewed in the BBC documentary, using the pseudonyms ‘Ivan’ and ‘Foma’, claimed to have had roles in various operations targeting Russian military assets and personnel, which were carried out in coordination with the GUR. The operatives claimed to oppose both Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the government of President Vladimir Putin. They maintained throughout the documentary that Putin’s political future depended on the outcome of the war, with Ivan adding “At the moment […] I think [Putin’s] regime might fall if they lose the war […]. Through our actions […] we are trying to speed this up”.
Mamon said he established and maintained contact over a period of two years with Ivan—a self-proclaimed Russian patriot and former member of the domestic political opposition to Putin’s government. Ivan allegedly operates inside Russia, where he claims to have surveilled Russian military sites and identified locations to conceal drone components in preparation for potential attacks on Russian assets. Ivan provided several videos to Mamon, including one of him appearing to hide explosives near a Russian military airfield. According to the other operative—alias Foma—who claimed to run a network of undercover operatives inside Russia, Ivan was involved in a June 2025 strike on Russia’s military drone plant in Yelabuga (pictured).
Foma, a Russian living in exile in Poland, said his network of volunteers inside Russia had surveilled the movements of senior military officers that the GUR was considering targeting. Foma contended he was formerly a part of the Russian elite and claimed to have a unique set of contacts and a steady flow of insider information from inside Russia. The documentary also identified Russian journalist and human rights activist Tatiana Kosinova, and anthropologist Denis Sokolov as working alongside Foma in Warsaw. Read more of this post
Filed under Expert news and commentary on intelligence, espionage, spies and spying Tagged with assassinations, GUR (Ukraine), News, Russia, sabotage, SBU (Ukraine), Ukraine