Hamas’s sophisticated deception strategy enabled October 7 attacks, study shows
July 4, 2026
by intelNews
A STUDY OF HAMAS documents seized by Israel during the Israel-Hamas war reveals the extent of sophistication of Hamas’s deception campaign. The Palestinian group deliberately portrayed itself as essentially deterred and focused on economic stability and on governing Gaza, rather than on a military confrontation with Israel. This successful misdirection repeatedly influenced Israeli security discussions. The key takeaway is that Hamas used deliberate deception tactics, including economic distraction, a West Bank focus, and covert military exercises, to mask its preparations for a large-scale attack against Israel.
The first comprehensive study of these seized documents, conducted by experts at the Amit Terrorism and Intelligence Research Institute in Israel, reveals that Hamas leaders, headed by Yahya Sinwar and military commander Mohammed Deif, saw Operation Guardian of the Walls in May 2021 as a major strategic success for the Palestinians. Building on this perception, they began developing what they saw as a decisive future campaign against Israel, believing that key parts of the Israeli operation reflected significant operational achievements that shaped this new strategy. By September 2022, Hamas’ military intelligence had called for a comprehensive deception plan encompassing political, military, economic, and media dimensions.
The goal was to create conditions for a surprise attack that would outdo Hamas’ past confrontations with Israel. The seized documents reveal that manipulating the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) organization, a distinct militant group that is active in Gaza, was key to Hamas’ approach. One key element was a policy of restraint and controlled escalation: Hamas avoided open military confrontation with Israel, and its leaders were told to contain violent incidents, which ultimately helped foster a perception of Israeli deterrence.
Therefore, Hamas consistently avoided escalation during heated incidents, maintained a strategy of presenting itself to Israel as uninterested in violent confrontation, and prioritized its long-term objectives by controlling the PIJ’s actions and refusing to join PIJ-initiated conflicts with Israeli security forces. This approach aimed to safeguard Hamas’s long-term project and prevent small-scale violent incidents from disrupting its broader plans.
A further element of the deception campaign was economic distraction. Hamas utilized Qatari financial aid, widely regarded as vital for Gaza, and distributed it to public-sector employees, which fostered the impression that the group prioritized economic development over military ambitions. Senior Israeli military officials reportedly believed that Sinwar understood his duty as being to safeguard the economic wellbeing of Gaza’s population and wished to avoid escalation. Hamas maintained this image by deliberately provoking border tensions to ensure ongoing Qatari funding in order to quell them. This apparent calm enabled continued military preparations by Hamas planners.
The Amit Institute study focuses on a number of early popular protests in Gaza that criticized Hamas. The movement redirected these demonstrations toward the Israeli border and intensified them to pressure the Israeli government and security establishment. For several months, Hamas focused its messaging on the West Bank, tensions at the Al-Aqsa Mosque, and Palestinian security prisoners in Israel, while keeping Gaza quiet. Senior Hamas figures promoted armed resistance in the West Bank as the main conflict area, which helped make Gaza appear calm compared to the more active West Bank. Meanwhile, Qatari funds continued to flow into Gaza, helping about 100,000 low-income families and created thousands of jobs.
The most striking part of the deception effort was the use of covert military exercises. Hamas’s military wing ran joint exercises to practice incursions into Israeli territory, the seizure of military positions and communities, and the kidnapping of soldiers. To hide their real purpose, these drills were described as routine training or defensive preparations for a possible Israeli attack. The exercises were documented and publicized, making them appear legitimate and demonstrating military capability.
The study suggests that Israeli decision-makers accepted the deception, even as recently as early October 2023. For example, they noted a large military exercise near Netiv HaAsara at the Gaza Strip’s northern border, which was attended by senior Hamas officials. In the final phase of the deception, public messages were delivered to Israel before the Jewish holiday season, signaling an interest in a new Gaza arrangement. Senior Hamas officials later said the campaign aimed to convince Israel that Hamas had been deterred. As a result, Israel believed Hamas was neither capable nor intent on launching an attack, thus allowing Hamas to continue long-term operational planning.
► Author: Avner Barnea* | Date: 04 July 2026 | Permalink
* Dr. Avner Barnea is a research fellow at the National Security Studies Center of the University of Haifa in Israel. He served as a senior officer in the Israel Security Agency (ISA). He is the author of We Never Expected That: A Comparative Study of Failures in National and Business Intelligence (Lexington Books, 2021).
intelNews.org 
Hamas’s sophisticated deception strategy enabled October 7 attacks, study shows
July 4, 2026 by intelNews Leave a comment
The first comprehensive study of these seized documents, conducted by experts at the Amit Terrorism and Intelligence Research Institute in Israel, reveals that Hamas leaders, headed by Yahya Sinwar and military commander Mohammed Deif, saw Operation Guardian of the Walls in May 2021 as a major strategic success for the Palestinians. Building on this perception, they began developing what they saw as a decisive future campaign against Israel, believing that key parts of the Israeli operation reflected significant operational achievements that shaped this new strategy. By September 2022, Hamas’ military intelligence had called for a comprehensive deception plan encompassing political, military, economic, and media dimensions.
The goal was to create conditions for a surprise attack that would outdo Hamas’ past confrontations with Israel. The seized documents reveal that manipulating the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) organization, a distinct militant group that is active in Gaza, was key to Hamas’ approach. One key element was a policy of restraint and controlled escalation: Hamas avoided open military confrontation with Israel, and its leaders were told to contain violent incidents, which ultimately helped foster a perception of Israeli deterrence.
Therefore, Hamas consistently avoided escalation during heated incidents, maintained a strategy of presenting itself to Israel as uninterested in violent confrontation, and prioritized its long-term objectives by controlling the PIJ’s actions and refusing to join PIJ-initiated conflicts with Israeli security forces. This approach aimed to safeguard Hamas’s long-term project and prevent small-scale violent incidents from disrupting its broader plans.
A further element of the deception campaign was economic distraction. Hamas utilized Qatari financial aid, widely regarded as vital for Gaza, and distributed it to public-sector employees, which fostered the impression that the group prioritized economic development over military ambitions. Senior Israeli military officials reportedly believed that Sinwar understood his duty as being to safeguard the economic wellbeing of Gaza’s population and wished to avoid escalation. Hamas maintained this image by deliberately provoking border tensions to ensure ongoing Qatari funding in order to quell them. This apparent calm enabled continued military preparations by Hamas planners.
The Amit Institute study focuses on a number of early popular protests in Gaza that criticized Hamas. The movement redirected these demonstrations toward the Israeli border and intensified them to pressure the Israeli government and security establishment. For several months, Hamas focused its messaging on the West Bank, tensions at the Al-Aqsa Mosque, and Palestinian security prisoners in Israel, while keeping Gaza quiet. Senior Hamas figures promoted armed resistance in the West Bank as the main conflict area, which helped make Gaza appear calm compared to the more active West Bank. Meanwhile, Qatari funds continued to flow into Gaza, helping about 100,000 low-income families and created thousands of jobs.
The most striking part of the deception effort was the use of covert military exercises. Hamas’s military wing ran joint exercises to practice incursions into Israeli territory, the seizure of military positions and communities, and the kidnapping of soldiers. To hide their real purpose, these drills were described as routine training or defensive preparations for a possible Israeli attack. The exercises were documented and publicized, making them appear legitimate and demonstrating military capability.
The study suggests that Israeli decision-makers accepted the deception, even as recently as early October 2023. For example, they noted a large military exercise near Netiv HaAsara at the Gaza Strip’s northern border, which was attended by senior Hamas officials. In the final phase of the deception, public messages were delivered to Israel before the Jewish holiday season, signaling an interest in a new Gaza arrangement. Senior Hamas officials later said the campaign aimed to convince Israel that Hamas had been deterred. As a result, Israel believed Hamas was neither capable nor intent on launching an attack, thus allowing Hamas to continue long-term operational planning.
► Author: Avner Barnea* | Date: 04 July 2026 | Permalink
* Dr. Avner Barnea is a research fellow at the National Security Studies Center of the University of Haifa in Israel. He served as a senior officer in the Israel Security Agency (ISA). He is the author of We Never Expected That: A Comparative Study of Failures in National and Business Intelligence (Lexington Books, 2021).
Related
Filed under Expert news and commentary on intelligence, espionage, spies and spying Tagged with 2023 Israel-Hamas War, Analysis, Avner Barnea, deception operations, Hamas, Israel, Palestine