Ex-MI6 head ‘might air memoirs’ to set Iraq War record straight

Sir Richard DearloveBy JOSEPH FITSANAKIS | intelNews.org |
The former director of Britain’s external spy service has hinted he might publish his personal account of the decisions that led to Britain’s entry in the Iraq War, if he is criticized in a public inquiry on the subject. Sir Richard Dearlove led the UK’s Secret Intelligence Service, known as SIS or MI6, from 1999 until his retirement in 2004. He is currently on sabbatical from his post as Master of Cambridge University’s Pembroke College, in order to research and author his autobiography. The memoir is believed to be largely preoccupied with the intelligence that led to the British government’s decision to enter the United States-led 2003 war in Iraq. Sir Richard had previously indicated that he intended to make his memoirs posthumously available as a resource to academic researchers. But in an email to British tabloid The Mail on Sunday, he hinted he would consider publishing his personal account if he finds himself criticized by the Iraq Inquiry. Known in Britain as the Chilcot Inquiry, after its Chairman, Sir John Chilcot, the Iraq Inquiry was commissioned by the British government in 2009 to investigate the executive decisions that led the country to participate in the invasion of Iraq. One of the inquiry’s many goals was to evaluate the intelligence provided by MI6 to the government of Prime Minister Tony Blair. There have been rumors that the inquiry’s declassified findings, which are scheduled for publication soon, are critical of MI6’s performance and place particular blame on Sir Richard’s role in the debacle. In his email to The Mail, the former MI6 director made clear he had “no intention, of violating [his] vows of official secrecy”. But he added that he would reconsider his decision to make his memoirs available to scholars only after his death “depending on what Chilcot publishes”. The core of Sir Richard’s dispute with Chilcot is said to center on the claim, propounded by the British government in 2003, that Iraq’s armed forces were able to fire chemical weapon missiles at British troops stationed on the Mediterranean island of Cyprus. This allegation, which found its way to the British press following a series of controlled leaks, largely informed the British government’s public argument in favor of joining the US war effort in Iraq. It later turned out, however, that MI6 had stressed to British government executives that the intelligence referred strictly to short-range battlefield munitions, rather than long-range weapons. Sources close to Sir Richard say he is adamant that the Chilcot inquiry should place the blame for the chemical weapons claim to Prime Minister Blair and his chief spokesperson at the time, Alastair Campbell.

About these ads

4 Responses to Ex-MI6 head ‘might air memoirs’ to set Iraq War record straight

  1. Pete says:

    “Former Chief MI6 blackmails UK Government” is not a good look.

    Gordon Corera’s “MI6″ also reveals that Dearlove, as a career profession, heavily influenced the political appointee as DCI George Tenet in pushing the Iraq WMD threat. That may be Tenet’s excuse though.

    Ultimately it was the Bush Administration, with its heart set on invading Iraq, that appeared to coerce all US agencies and the UK into interpreting intelligence in a way that supported the invade Iraq case.

  2. steve says:

    Thank goodness someone, who participated in the debates and studied the intelligence, can give us the definitive cause for war while at the same time backing away from a direct statement:

    “Ultimately it was the Bush Administration, with its heart set on invading Iraq, that appeared to coerce all US agencies and the UK into interpreting intelligence in a way that supported the invade Iraq case.”

  3. Kidd says:

    if he does write this memoir, he’ll place the blame elsewhere. if he were to possibly expose some dark secret, he’d die from a suicide attempt before the book had even gone to the publisher

  4. Pete says:

    Yes Steve

    As it transpires those “who participated in the debates and studied the intelligence” were beholden to their political masters and/or believed such sources as Curveball.

    Have you heard of Curveball?

    Would you trust the judgement of Tenet?

    Cheers

    Pete

IntelNews welcomes corrections. Send us yours by filling in the form below.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 725 other followers