Louisiana | intelNews.org

News you may have missed #343

May 5, 2010 by intelNews Leave a comment

Taliban leader H. Mehsud reportedly not dead. Last February US and Pakistani officials claimed a CIA airstrike had killed Hakimullah Mehsud, the leader of the largest faction of the Pakistani Taliban. But it now appears that Mehsud is alive and well.
Analysis: Operation MINCEMEAT and the ethics of spying. The New Yorker‘s Malcolm Gladwell on operation MINCEMEAT, a World War II British deception plan, which helped convince the German high command that the Allies planned to invade Greece and Sardinia in 1943, instead of Sicily.
US DoJ announces FISA court appointment. Judge Martin L.C. Feldman, of the Eastern District of Louisiana, has been appointed to a seven-year term on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance (FISA) Court, which reviews (and invariably approves) government applications for counterintelligence surveillance and physical search under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

Filed under Expert news and commentary on intelligence, espionage, spies and spying Tagged with 0 Analysis: Operation MINCEMEAT and the ethics of spying, 0 Taliban leader H. Mehsud reportedly not dead, 0 US DoJ announces FISA court appointment, Analysis, assassinations, CIA, deception operations, Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, Germany, Hakimullah Mehsud, history, Louisiana, Martin L.C. Feldman, News, news you may have missed, Operation MINCEMEAT, Pakistan, Predator drones, Taliban, UK, US Department of Justice, World War II

Analysis: Landrieu-Gate is Scary, but it’s No Watergate

January 29, 2010 by intelNews Leave a comment

Stan Dai

By J. FITSANAKIS and I. ALLEN | intelNews.org |
The arrests by US Marshals of four self-described conservative activists, who were caught trying to tamper with the telephone lines of Democratic Senator Mary Landrieu’ New Orleans office, have caused outcry in liberal and silence in conservative blogs. Most political allies of the four young men have been scrambling to denounce them, and the few who haven’t, have tried to play off the case as an ill-conceived political prank that got out of hand. Considering that America’s political culture still reels from the effects of Watergate (1972-1974), and the far more serious COINTELPRO (1956-1971), it would be criminal neglect on behalf of the FBI to treat the Landrieu incident as a “prank”. At the same time, however, Landrieu-gate is no Watergate. Neither the target nor the operational tactics and institutional affiliations of the four men involved in the case resemble anything remotely akin to either Watergate or COINTELPRO. Keep reading →