Analysis: Austrian officials warn of increased spying against military targets
April 26, 2026 9 Comments
THE AUSTRIAN DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE Agency, the Abwehramt (AbwA), as well as the Austrian Chief of the General Staff, have publicly warned in recent weeks that intelligence targeting of the Austrian military, the Bundesheer, has increased markedly. There has not only been a significant rise in unauthorized drone flights near and over military installations, but also instances of individuals gathering information through vehicular-based surveillance outside facilities. Traditional recruitment methods by foreign intelligence services have also been observed—although no public disclosure has emerged on how frequent these attempts are.
Reinhard Ruckenstuhl, head of the AbwA, notes in his contribution to the Risk Monitor 2026 – The End of Order, which provides brief risk assessments for public consumption, that “[t]he armament and defense efforts of Austria and its neighboring countries […] represent particularly attractive targets for foreign military intelligence services.” He states that, while technological developments open new avenues for gathering information and facilitating espionage, human agents and sources remain important, even “en vogue,” as he puts it. Here he identifies a problem since “[i]n Austria, [foreign agents] are predominantly deployed under diplomatic cover. In the case of this type of cover, they particularly benefit from the strong presence of international organizations and the respective national missions in Austria.”
Ruckenstuhl continues by specifically naming Russia, noting that its intelligence services are “increasingly relying on civilians recruited digitally to carry out their missions.” These assignments “range from simple tasks such as carrying out socially polarizing actions to spying on military support for Ukraine to specific acts of sabotage.” The individuals recruited in this way do not receive any training. Although not mentioned in his assessment, it is now a widely held view in German-speaking Europe that it is part of the calculus of the Russian intelligence services, that such individuals will be 
caught sooner rather than later. This has led to them being labeled “Wegwerfagenten” (“throwaway agents”). While Ruckenstuhl does not address this aspect, he clearly states that the success of this method will likely lead other (antagonistic) intelligence services to adopt similar approaches, which he describes as a “non-professionalization.” As a result, he concludes that “this confronts Austrian intelligence services with challenges that will have to be met with equally adapted methods backed by an appropriate legal basis.” Ruckenstuhl finishes with what seems—in the eyes of this author—like a thinly veiled cautionary note to executive and legislative decision-makers when he notes that, noting: “At the same time, the penalties for foreign intelligence operations in Austria lag behind those in other European countries, thereby limiting their deterrent effect. Austria will therefore remain an important hub and safe haven for foreign intelligence services.” Read more of this post
IN LATE NOVEMBER 2025 news broke that the selection for the new director of Austria’s domestic intelligence service, the 
technology—which earned her the title of an engineer—Mayer joined the Austrian uniformed police in Linz, the country’s third largest city.
ON MAY 26, THE Austrian domestic intelligence service, 
and specialized essays about certain relevant topics. Traditionally the media and public give most attention to those parts of the report that deal with extremism and terrorism of all kinds inside Austria.
an unwanted wrench in President [Donald] Trump’s negotiation process to resolve the atomic crisis with Iran’s rulers because the data outlined in the report suggests the regime will not abandon its drive to secure a nuclear weapon.”
ON JUNE 26, THE longwinded case of Austria’s counter intelligence failure regarding a possible inside threat took yet another —quite surprising— turn: the state court of Vienna (Landesgericht Wien) released from pre-trial detention (Untersuchungshaft) 
Tatverdacht) against Ott, the reasons for his further detention were not sufficiently given. In the judges’ view, all activities that could carry a pre-trial detention were committed before Ott was arrested and released for the first time in 2021. Back then, Ott had also been released after a short detention, following a decision by the same court. Briefly summarized, in 2021 the Landesgericht concluded that Ott could no longer spy against Austria as he did not have access to classified information, having been removed from the domestic intelligence agency years earlier. Additionally, since the BVT was in the process of reorganization and reformation at that point, the judges 
ON GOOD FRIDAY, MARCH 29, Egisto Ott, a former member of Austria’s now-dissolved domestic intelligence agency, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution and Counterterrorism (BVT), was arrested in his house in Carinthia, Austria’s southernmost state. Ott had frequently been at the center of media attention in the past year, in connection with the network surrounding the fugitive 
These included contacts in friendly foreign police services, whom Ott knew from his time as a liaison officer in Italy and Turkey. According to Gridling, these contacts were unaware that Ott had been removed from the BVT under suspicion of being unreliable and potentially even working for Russia. They therefore continued to help him when asked. Ott allegedly deceived his contacts by claiming that he needed information on cases relating to different kinds of extremism. As it turned out, according to the leaked arrest warrant, several of the individuals referred to by Ott as “suspects” in terrorism investigations were in fact Russian dissidents or intelligence defectors who were living as protected persons in Austria and elsewhere outside Russia.
Germany arrests former BND spy chief on suspicion of espionage, treason
October 7, 2026 by intelNews 1 Comment
These are serious allegations that could have grave consequences for the Germany, given that Hanning was head of the Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND), Germany’s civilian foreign intelligence service, from 1998 to 2005. After leaving this position, Hanning served as a Staatssekretär (state secretary—the highest-ranking civil servant) at the Federal Ministry of the Interior. What is publicly known at this time is that Hanning is suspected of having illegally gained access to classified BND information for several years after leaving his position there. He allegedly received this information from his former office manager (Büroleiter), identified only as Manfred D., who has also been arrested.
The Federal Prosecutor’s Office, which is in charge of the case, reportedly became aware of Hanning’s suspected activities after it raided a number of private and business premises used by Hanning. The searches took place in connection with a cross-border custody case involving the attempted kidnapping of two children in Denmark on behalf of their mother. Hanning has always denied any involvement in the alleged kidnapping attempt or other wrongdoing related to the custody case.
On the intelligence front, it is now alleged that Hanning and his former colleague, “D.”, agreed as early as 2010 that “D.” would provide material to his former superior. The material found during the investigation indicates that this arrangement continued at least until June 2022. Overall, it appears that Hanning received close to 2,000 documents. “D.” most likely received payments for providing the documents—although the amount is not currently known. The former office manager himself retired in March 2026, after serving as head of office for several of Hanning’s successors.
In at least one case, Hanning appears to have used confidential material (Verschlusssache) to produce an analysis intended for “an agent of a foreign intelligence service”. It is currently unclear whether this analysis was merely drafted, or whether it was also
delivered to the foreign agent. While it is not known which foreign country the intelligence service belongs to, it was almost immediately alleged that it is not Russia. This has the hallmarks of a controlled leak by the German authorities, who presumably wish to advertise this with a very high degree of certainty to the German public and their allies alike.
In another case, Hanning stands accused of having used information from BND documents in his communications with an agent of a foreign power.
Many of the documents and pieces of information provided were intelligence reports prepared for the weekly high-level meeting of Germany’s security services at the Federal Chancellery. Some of the reports are described as highly sensitive, dealing with topics such as the Iranian nuclear program or the Russian Armed Forces. Material from allied intelligence services might also have been handed over to Hanning. Read more of this post
Filed under Expert news and commentary on intelligence, espionage, spies and spying Tagged with August Hanning, BND, espionage, Germany, Manfred D., News, Paul Schliefsteiner